Page 11 - IBBI-JUNE-SEPTEMBER 2022
P. 11

+RPH EX\HUV ÀOed application seeking to initiate the CIRP against the CD
             for its failure to honour its commitment. The AA noted that promoter of
             the CD was appointed as a director on the board of marketing agency and
             that the CD and marketing agency were being managed either directly or
             indirectly by the same person. Further, the home buyers are not privy to the
             agreement between the CD and its marketing agency and that they cannot
             be punished for the misdeeds of the marketing agency. It was observed that
             ZKHUH &' IDLOV WR IXOÀO LWV OHJDO REOLJDWLRQV  SLHUFLQJ RI FRUSRUDWH YHLO LV YLWDO
             to ensure that the principle of distinct corporate personality is not misused.
             The AA lifted the corporate veil of the CD and admitted the application. The
             ‘doctrine of distinct legal entity’ plea as claimed by the CD and its marketing
             agency with respect to non-refund of the money deposited by the home
             buyers could not be accepted.
                                                                     Notes:
             State Bank of India Vs. Krishidhan Seeds Pvt Ltd [TP 82 of 2019   These CIRPs are in respect of 5721 CDs.
                                                                     This excludes 1 CD which has moved directly from BIFR to resolution.
             [CP(IB) 500 of 2018]
                                                                     6RXUFH  &RPSLODWLRQ IURP ZHEVLWH RI WKH 1&/7 DQG ÀOLQJ E\ ,3V
             M/s. Krishidhan Seeds Pvt. Ltd. committed default of  ` 89.42 crore and
             DFFRXQW VOLSSHG LQWR 13$ RQ -XQH           )& ÀOHG VHFWLRQ   DSSOLFDWLRQ
             against the CD on September 19, 2018. The AA vide order dated September
             16, 2020, rejected the application holding that the claim of the FC is barred
             by time. The AA’s order was challenged before the NCLAT, which dismissed
             the appeal. The SC by its order dated April 18, 2022 set aside both the
             orders directing AA to adjudicate afresh. FC contended that CIRP is being
             XVHG  IRU  WKH  ZHOIDUH  DQG  EHQHÀW  RI  WKH  &' and only because the CD
             deposited `   FURUHV LQ 276 RI RQH RI WKH FUHGLWRUV LV QRW VXIÀFLHQW WR KROG
             that the company started reviving back.
             The AA noted that the CD had paid a debt of ` 2 crore to ICICI Bank and
             has also deposited a sum of ` 6 crore in the loan account of creditor towards
             the part payment of the settlement. The AA further observed that there are
             thousands of employees and workmen working with the CD and the CD has
             generated revenue of ` 175 crore in the last year. Placing reliance on the SC
             judgement in the Vidarbha Industries case and taking into consideration the
             submissions made by the CD that its management is trying hard to take the
             company out of the debt trap, the AA has kept the proceeding in abeyance
             for six months. The AA further observed that if the CD fails to settle the
             debts, it will pass further orders and directed it not to sale the mortgaged
             assets without consent of the FC.
             IBBI
             'XULQJ  WKH  TXDUWHU   WKH  'LVFLSOLQDU\  &RPPLWWHH $XWKRULVHG  2IÀFHU  RI
             the IBBI disposed of 25 show cause notices issued to the IPs/RVOs for
             contravention of the provisions of law by passing suitable orders.
             Corporate Processes
             The data provided in this section regarding corporate processes is
             provisional, as it is getting revised on a continuous basis depending on the
             ÁRZ  RI  XSGDWHG  LQIRUPDWLRQ  DV  UHFHLYHG  IURP  ,3V  RU  WKH  LQIRUPDWLRQ  LQ
             respect of process changes. For example, a process may ultimately yield an
             order for liquidation even after approval of resolution plan or may ultimately
             yield resolution plan even after an order for liquidation.

             Insolvency Resolution
             The provisions relating to CIRP came into force on December 1, 2016.
             A total of 5893 CIRPs have commenced by the end of September, 2022
             as presented in Figure 1. Of these, 3946 have been closed. Of the CIRPs
             closed, the CD was rescued in 2139 cases, of which 846 have been closed on
             appeal or review or settled; 740 have been withdrawn; and 553 cases have
             ended in approval of resolution plans; while 1807 have ended in orders for
             liquidation (Figure 2). Sectoral distribution of CDs under CIRP is presented
             in Figures 3-6.



                                                                                                                      11



                                                                                                                 11/15/2022   12:24:48 PM
       IBBI newsletter.indd   11
       IBBI newsletter.indd   11                                                                                 11/15/2022   12:24:48 PM
   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16