NCLAT

IP OTHER
Sr.No. Orders Date Subject Orders Remarks
501 21 Mar, 2025 In the matter of Dilipkumar Lokooram Arora vs. KTR Management Service Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. [CA (AT) (Ins) No. 2183 of 2024]   (322.51 KB) Closure-12A / appeal/ review or settlement
502 21 Mar, 2025 In the matter of Dilipkumar Lokooram Arora vs. KTR Management Service Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. [CA (AT) (Ins) No. 2183 of 2024]   (321.8 KB) Disposed of
503 21 Mar, 2025 In the matter of United Futuristic Trade Impex Pvt. Ltd. vs. Varaha Infra Ltd. [I.A. No. 1823 & 1825 of 2025 in CA (AT) (Ins) No. 480 of 2025]   (286.77 KB) Dismissed
504 21 Mar, 2025 In the matter of Vishal Sachdev vs. Infraweld Services & Anr. [CA (AT) (Ins) No. 447 of 2025]   (120.79 KB) Stay Order
505 21 Mar, 2025 In the matter of Divyesh Desai & Ors. vs. Gujarat Industrial Development Corporation Bhuj & Ors. [I.A. No.3974 of 2024 in CA (AT) (Ins) No. 1084 & 1103 of 2024]   (242.65 KB) Allowed
506 21 Mar, 2025 In the matter of Evergreen Corporation vs. Satec Envir Engineering (India) Pvt. Ltd. [I.A. No. 8804 of 2024 in CA (AT) (Ins) No. 2349 of 2024]   (393.81 KB) Condonation of Delay
507 19 Mar, 2025 In the matter of Gaurav Jindal vs. Debashish Nanda & Ors. [I.A. No. 7357 of 2024 in CA (AT) (Ins) No. 2076 of 2024]   (317.28 KB) Others
508 19 Mar, 2025 In the matter of Alchemist Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd. vs. ASC Insolvency Services LLP & Ors. [I.A. No. 717 of 2025 in CA (AT) (Ins) No. 179 of 2025]   (257.85 KB) Stay
509 19 Mar, 2025 In the matter of Pankaj Kalra vs. Greeka Greens Solution (India) Limited [CA (AT) (Ins) No. 1783 of 2024]   (272 KB) Allowed
510 18 Mar, 2025 In the matter of Anjanee Kumar Lakhotia vs. IDBI Bank Limited & Ors. [CA (AT) (Ins) No. 198 of 2025]   (190.62 KB) Dismissed
511 18 Mar, 2025 In the matter of KVD Windpark Social Welfare Association & Ors. vs. Consortium of Brij Kishore Trading & Sumit Kumar Khanna (SRA for K V Developers Pvt. Ltd.) & Anr. [I.A. No. 8821 of 2024 in CA (AT) (Ins) No. 2362 of 2024]   (280.2 KB) Rejected
512 18 Mar, 2025 In the matter of Gateway Investment Management Services Ltd. & Ors. Vs ASC Insolvency Services LLP & Ors. [I.A. No. 717 & 1083 of 2025 in CA (AT) (Ins) No. 148 & 179 of 2025]   (239.2 KB) Stay
513 18 Mar, 2025 In the matter of Paresh Rastogi vs. Omkara Assets Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. [CA (AT) (Ins) Nos. 2053, 2054 and 2117 of 2024]   (317.28 KB) Dismissed
514 18 Mar, 2025 In the matter of PTC Engineering India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Naresh Kumar Munjal [CA (AT) (Ins) No. 444 of 2025]   (308.24 KB) Dismissed
515 18 Mar, 2025 In the matter of Madhubala Chauhan vs. Phoenix Arc Pvt. Ltd. [CA (AT) (Ins) No. 604 of 2024]   (422.92 KB) Dismissed
516 18 Mar, 2025 In the matter of Rajabhau Shinde & Ors. vs. S.M. Electric Works & Ors. [I.A. No. 2989 of 2024 in CA (AT) (Ins) No. 826 & 1655 of 2024]   (345.75 KB) Dismissed
517 18 Mar, 2025 In the matter of Findoc Finvest Private Limited vs. Surendera Raj Gang & Ors. [CA (AT) (Ins) No.249 of 2025]   (162.05 KB) Dismissed
518 17 Mar, 2025 In the matter of State Bank of India vs. Santoshi Hyvolt Electricals Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. [I.A. No. 245 of 2025 in CA (AT) (Ins) No. 62 of 2025]   (348.5 KB) Dismissed
519 17 Mar, 2025 In the matter of Authum Investment and Infrastructure Limited vs. Ashdan Properties Private Limited [I.A. No. 5973 & 6380 of 2024 in CA (AT) (Ins) No. 1566 of 2024]   (234.47 KB) Allowed
520 13 Mar, 2025 In the matter of Umesh Mishra vs. Srei Equipment Finance Ltd. [IA No 435 & 436/2023 in CA (AT) (CH) (Ins) No.128 & 129/2023]   (122.95 KB) Stay Order
Disclaimer - The Orders/Judgments of judicial authorities as available on the website of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) are received from various sources and the IBBI does not authenticate the contents of these Orders/Judgments. These Orders/Judgments are not certified copies issued by the judicial authorities. The Orders/Judgments of Courts/Tribunals available on IBBIs website are merely for facilitation purpose. One must do his own research or read the original text of the Orders/Judgments. The Board or its officers will not be held responsible for any damage or loss or liability to anyone, of any kind, in any manner arising therefrom.